My removal from the UK Nov. 1 was brutal, illegal &discriminated for being Jamaican.
Home Office breached Judicial Review/STOP ORDER on removal/Court Orders & brutally removed me for the same charges which the Independent Tribunal rejected twice & told Home Office that “I cannot see where Ms Small has broken ANY immigration laws” & to grant me indefinite then grants me indefinite bail but 4 months later, Home Office breached the Court’s orders & brutally removed me for the same charges Nov. 1.
I have now acquired New Evidence AFTER appeals, reconsideration & complaints have been dismissed which indicate that Home Office manipulates & add fabricated documents in my appeals to cover breached Court Orders & brutally removal.
Nov. 7, Under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 on MAIN IND File, “SMALLING-SMALL” Home Office Birmingham charged me with illegal entry then overstaying as per their FIRST removal Notice of Nov. 6 even though it was THEIR Officer who failed to endorse my Passport with Landing & Visa Stamp when I re-enter the UK May 31.
MAY/JUNE the Independent Tribunal at AIT B’ham, independent of Home Office, established & authorized by UK Law/Parliament to determine immigration disputed removals & to execute judiciary powers, REJECTS Home Office’s FIRST removal Notice of Nov. 6 for Illegal Entry & Overstaying TWICE & ordered Home Office not to remove, re-arrest/detained me INDEFINITELY but 4 months later, Home Office breached the Court’s orders & brutally removed me for the SAME charges Nov. 1.
GROUNDS/issues in dispute:
As per Home Office Birmingham letter of Nov. 27, “Oct. 29, I was arrested for Overstaying & removed for Overstaying” (Nov. 1).
As per the Ombudsman & Deputy letters of May 23 & Sept. 6, “The Notice of Nov. 6 is for Overstaying & Illegal Entry”.
Sept. 16, Home Office B’ham gave me THEIR earliest appointment (Oct. 29) when I contacted IND Public Enquiry Office 1month & 8 days before my visa expires (Oct. 24) which is 5 DAYS outside my visa then charged & removed for Overstaying Nov. 1.
Oct. 29, at appointment, my application to remain challenging absence of Landing & Visa Stamp of May 31 was stamped “REJECTED” citing discrepancies on my Passport, no landing & visa stamp. I was then arrested, booked into Solihull Police Station for illegal entry, interviewed by MEU Officer Vicky Dunbarton & release to provide proof of travel Nov. 3.
Nov. 3, I provide letter from Darlington Travel Agency confirming my travel May 17-30, Air Jamaica Package with Plane Ticket Receipt still attached, first Passport, second Passport with INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970 & amendment CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 with Birth Paper & Marriage license confirming CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970, my picture was then taken with fingerprints & barred from classes at the University. 3 Days later, Home Office served me with illegal entry papers Nov. 6 & confirmed by the British High Commission, 3 months after removal.
Nov. 6, HOME OFFICE Birmingham served me with their FIRST removal Notice for Illegal entry & Overstaying under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970, on Main IND CROYDON file when I challenge the absence of Landing & Visa Stamp which THEIR Officer failed to issue when I re-enter the UK May 31 as advised by my solicitor that’s it legal to challenge.
May 5 - 6, I was re-arrested & booked into Thornhill Police Station for illegal entry.
May 6– June 8, I was taken to Yarls’ Wood Detention Centre for removal & on my file stamped “ILLEGAL ENTRANT”. At first schedule removal, I told the Officer that “I did not enter the UK illegally” & he told me “we do not want anymore Jamaicans here” & shoved me back into the Carrier Van. At second schedule removal, while at the Airport, my second Judicial Review was granted & STOP ORDER on removal for Ann Marie Small faxed to Home Office to attend Bail Hearing June 8.
June 8, At Bail Hearing, I told the Judge that “I did not enter the UK illegally” the Judge asked me “why didn’t I attend the second appointment with IND”, I told the Judge that “IND keep saying that I am not Ann Marie Small & that I enter the UK illegally” the Judge told Home Office that “I cannot see where Ms Small has broken ANY immigration laws” & to grant me indefinite then grants me indefinite bail with condition to sign on each day/as per Home Office.
June 9-11, I signed on at Home Office Birmingham under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 as per Court Orders then every Thursdays as per Home Office which in total 20 times till breach Oct. 14.
July I re-enrolled to sit Management Accounting Level 2 exams at the Financial Training Company, Birmingham due to interruption of unlawful arrest/detention May 5 – June 8 & resume part-time Evening Call Handler Job at Primecare Birmingham.
Oct. 14, when I went to signed on for the 21st time, the Immigration Officer asked me “how much years do I need to complete my education” & when I said “3 years”, I was instantly re-arrested, served with second removal Notice for next day removal Oct. 15 which was not authorized by the Independent Tribunal then sent back to Yarls’ Wood Detention Centre when Air Jamaica cancelled their flight & brutally escorted from the UK Nov. 1, 23 days before my exams.
Home Office breached the Court’s orders, served me with second removal Notice Oct. 14 for next day removal which was not authorized by the independent tribunal & brutally removed me from the UK for the same charges which the Independent Tribunal rejected TWICE & ordered Home Office not to remove, re-arrest/detained me INDEFINITELY but 4 months later, Home Office breached the Court’s orders when I answered “3 years to complete my education & since I’ve been in the UK past 7 years due to Home Office mislaid of my Passport, 3 more years would make it 10 years where I could still apply for indefinite.
Home Office did not want anymore Jamaicans in the UK as per Immigration Officer at removal. I told the Judge June 8 that Home Office keep pretending/saying that “I am not Ann Marie Small & that I enter the UK illegally” & the Judge grants me indefinite bail/ordered Home Office not to remove, re-arrest/detained me INDEFINITELY but 4 months later, Home Office breached the Court’s orders & escort me back to Jamaica in handcuffs, drag me up plane stairs, covering my nose & mouth trying to stop me from crying, nearly rendering me unconscious for the SAME charges which the independent tribunal, independent of Home Office rejected twice.
New evidence acquired from AIT in 2009 After appeals, reconsiderations & complaints have been dismissed indicates that Home Office manipulates & add fabricated documents in my appeals to cover breached removal/Court Orders as per Appeal IM/05958, INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970, second file in my name “SMALL” by Home Office Birmingham.
As per AIT Emails 2008 & Helpdesk Grace Sansome Email there are 2 files in my names under different DOB’s (separate removal charges) as per Appeal IM/07162 & IM/05958 but ONLY 1 out of 2 FILES was used/passed to the AIT Judges in my appeals which makes my immigration history clouded & appeals dismissed.
1. MAIN IND FILE by Home Office Croydon – “SMALLING-SMALL” under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 as per Appeal IM/07162, charged & removed for illegal entry as per British High Commission 3 months after removal & Ombudsman 3 years after removal & Bail Hearing June 8 confirmed on AIT Letter of April 28.
2. SECOND/new IND FILE by Home Office B’ham – “SMALL” under INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970 as per Appeal IM/05958, charged & removed for Overstaying as per Home Office B’ham’s letter of Nov. 27, where my immigration history is clouded in that it appeared that I had overstayed as NO MATCH to my previous appeal/Bail Hearing June 8/Court Orders was found which meant that all my documents were not contained in one file/Home Office B’ham’s file as per Grace Sansome of the AIT email 2009 & she apologise for this.
As per the AIT Helpdesk Grace Sansome email of Sept. 8, “a new appeal IM/05958, INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970 was created when NO MATCH to my previous appeal was found which meant that ALL my documents were not contained in one file/Home Office B’ham’s new/second file in my name “SMALL” while on MAIN IND FILE, “SMALLING-SMALL” under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970, the AIT letter of April 28 confirms Bail Hearing June 8 where charge of Overstaying & Illegal Entry as per Home Office FIRST removal Notice of Nov. 6 was served & rejected twice by the Independent Tribunal MAY/ JUNE & where Home Office was told that “I cannot see where Ms Small has broken ANY immigration laws” & ordered not to remove, re-arrest/detained me INDEFINITELY but 4 months later, Home Office breached the Court’s orders & brutally removed me for the SAME charges Nov. 1, 23 days before my exams.
Home Office knew that without public trial, they can pass ANY fabricated documents to cover breached Court orders/discrepancies as per Appeal IM/05958, INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970 hence quick/next day removal for the same rejected charges.
Nov. 3, after breached removal, I appealed Overstaying as per Appeal 2005 & ONLY 1 out of 2 FILES was passed to the AIT Judge. My main IND file which states that I was removed for illegal entry was passed to the AIT Judge & my case dismissed.
Feb. 23, I applied for Student Visa to sit CIMA old syllabus exams already paid but my application was refused citing “you were served with illegal entry papers & removed following an unsuccessful leave to remain application” as per the British High Commission.
May 25, I appealed illegal entry charge & removal as per Appeal INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970 & my case was dismissed stating that I was removed for Overstaying & no reference was made of illegal entry charge or removal.
Aug. 7, on follow-up on Appeal INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970, the Senior Immigration Judge McGeachy state that “the Immigration Judge was entitled to reach her decision based on the EVIDENCE received, the CORE of this appeal is that my immigration history is clouded in that it appeared that I had overstayed” when charge of Overstaying as per Home Office FIRST removal Notice of Nov. 6 was already served & rejected TWICE by the Independent Tribunal under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 on Main IND file at Bail Hearing June 8 where Home Office was ordered not to remove, re-arrest/detained me INDEFINITELY but 4 months later Home Office breached the Court’s orders & brutally removed me for the same charges Nov. 1.
When I appealed illegal entry charge & removal, Home Office B’ham withheld MAIN IND FILE under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 “SMALLING-SMALL” which they used from arrest, Bail Hearing June 8 to breached removal Nov. 1 & last used as per Appeal 2005 & instead open & pass new/second file in my name “SMALL” as per Appeal INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970 so that the AIT wouldn’t see that Home Office breached their Court’s Orders & brutally removed me for the same charges Nov. 1 so my appeal was dismissed citing immigration history is clouded in that it appeared that I had overstayed as NO MATCH to my previous appeal/Bail Hearing June 8 was found.
I signed 20 Documents as per Court Orders under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 at Home Office Birmingham from June 9 – 11 then every Thursday till re-arrest Oct. 14 & breached removal Nov. 1 YET NO MATCH to my previous appeal/Bail Hearing June 8/Court Orders was found in Home Office B’ham file who arrest me Oct. 29, took me to Bail Hearing June 8, re-arrest/detained me Oct. 14 & removed Nov. 1.
Home Office removed/withheld crucial documents (Court Orders) from my FILES as per 3 LETTERS from the Ombudsman Feb. 19, May 23 & Sept. 6.
As per the Ombudsman, she received ALL MY FILES, my MAIN IND FILE & another from their Midlands Enforcement Unit (Home Office B’ham) & for COMPLETENESS she has CAREFULLY examine ALL MY FILES yet there is no evidence to support my allegations that I was told that If I was not an illegal entrant then I would not be removed, my Judicial Review refused citing “claim not arguable” & On the 1 Nov. Ms Small was removed to Jamaica. Her appeals against the removal decision was dismissed”
5 MALADMINISTRATION found in ALL 3 letters from the Ombudsman:
3 Letters from the Ombudsman & Deputy of 2007 states, “On 1 Nov. Ms Small was removed to Jamaica. Her appeals against the removal decision was dismissed”.
My appeal against the removal decision was NOT dismissed before breached removal Nov. 1. Second Judicial Review was GRANTED MAY on the VERY DAY of removal with STOP ORDER on removal for ANN MARIE SMALL faxed to Home Office at Yarls’ Wood Detention Centre & Court Orders of June 8 ordering Home Office not to remove, re-arrest/detained me INDEFIITELY but 4 months later, Home Office breached the Court’s orders & removed me for the SAME CHARGES.
Home Office passed my FIRST Judicial Review which was incorrectly done & refused citing “claim not arguable” to the Ombudsman but SECOND Judicial Review granted on the VERY DAY of removal with STOP ORDER on removal for Ann Marie Small, Court Orders of June 8 was WITHHELD from the Ombudsman/not in my files as at 7.
What happen to my second Judicial Review granted on the VERY DAY of Home Office Birmingham’s second schedule removal MAY?
Where is STOP ORDER on removal for Ann Marie Small which was faxed to Home Office at Yarls’ Wood Detention Centre giving instructions to attend Bail Hearing June 8?
What happen to the Transcript/outcome of Bail Hearing June 8?
As per AIT Helpdesk Grace Sansome email of Sept. 8 “both files are in STORAGE” at AIT yet ALL my appeals/complaints have been dismissed for lack of evidence to support my claim. I cannot lie of attending Court & there were 3 witnesses with me, my solicitor Mrs. Joanne Gordon of Maudel Maud Immigration Consultants, supervisor at Primecare B’ham/surety Natasha Salmon & friend Donecia Demontagna.
The AIT letter of April 28 confirms Bail Hearing June 8 under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970, “SMALLING-SMALL” on Main IND file as per Appeal 2005.
Upon release June 8, I report my Flat broken into to the Thornhill Police Station while in detention May 5-June 7 & report damage door to Birmingham Housing who came & change lock.
4. May 23, the Ombudsman’s state that:
It appears that IND has made a mistake when they stated that Ms Small is an illegal entrant. In any case, Ms Small has appealed that decision & no reference was made to her being an illegal entrant”.
Home Office was aware from Nov. 3 that I did not enter the UK illegally, Home Office has CONCRETE evidence of travel (I provide urine before I board the flight back to the UK & complete Immigration Status Form when I arrived at Manchester Airport May 31) but Home Office pretended otherwise & served me with illegal entry papers 3 days later. I told the Judge June 8 that Home Office was pretending that I am not Ann Marie Small & that I enter the UK illegally & the Judge told Home Office that he could not see where I had broken ANY immigration laws & to grant me indefinite but 4 months later, Home Office breached the Court’s Orders & brutally removed me for the same charges Nov. 1.
When I appealed illegal entry charge & removal as per Appeal INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970, Home Office WITHHELD my MAIN IND FILE under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 which they used from arrest, Bail Hearing June 8 to breached removal Nov. 1 & state illegal entry charge & removal as per the British High Commission 3 months after removal, WASN’T used/passed to the AIT Judges in my appeals INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970 which makes my immigration history clouded as NO MATCH to my previous appeal/ Bail Hearing June 8 found.
The AIT letter of April 28 confirms Bail Hearing June 8 under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970, “SMALLING-SMALL” on Main IND file as per Appeal 2005.
I signed 20 Documents as per Court Orders under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 at Home Office Birmingham from June 9 – 11 then every Thursday till re-arrest Oct. 14 & breached removal Nov. 1 YET NO MATCH to a previous appeal/Bail Hearing June 8/Court Orders was found in Home Office B’ham file who arrest me Oct. 29, took me to Bail Hearing June 8, re-arrest/detained & brutally removed me Nov. 1.
5. Sept. 6, the Deputy Ombudsman’s state that:
The Notice of Nov. 6 is for Overstaying & she has seen documents with crucial decision to remove me for Overstaying.
MAY/JUNE 8, the Independent Tribunal, independent of Home Office, established authorized & by UK Law/Parliament to determine immigration disputed removals & to exercise judiciary power REJECT Home Office’s FIRST removal Notice of Nov. 6 for Overstaying & Illegal entry TWICE under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 on MAIN IND FILE & ordered Home Office not to remove, re-arrest/detained me INDEFINITELY but 4 months later, Home Office breached the Court’s Orders & brutally removed me for the SAME charge.
Documents seen by the Deputy Ombudsman that “crucial decision was made to remove me for overstaying” was NOT authorized by the independent tribunal as per Home Office’s Second Removal Notice received Oct. 14 for next day removal & therefore illegal.
Home Office gave me their earliest appointment 5 DAYS outside my visa when I contacted them ONE MONTH & EIGHT DAYS before my Visa expires. The Independent Adjudicator told Home Office that he could not see where I had broken ANY immigration laws, rejects Home Office first removal Notice & ordered Home Office not to remove, re-arrest/detained me INDEFINITELY then 4 months later, Home Office breached the Court’s orders & brutally removed me for the same rejected charges.
As per ALL 3 LETTERS from the Ombudsman & Deputy Ombudsman in “the appeal system, independent of IND/Home Office, is the method established by Parliament for determining disputed removal decisions”.
Don’t the appeal system work both ways? My removal from the UK was brutal, illegal & discriminated for being Jamaican.
As per ECHR Law, “the Convention”, Article 5, #4, “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a Court and release ordered if the detention is not lawful. (I was detained May 5-8 & granted INDEFINITE BAIL June 8, re-arrest/detained Oct 14 – Nov. 1 removed for charges rejected twice by the independent tribunal, independent of Home Office).
Article 6 – Right to a fair trial has been denied to date as per NEW EVIDENCE acquired AFTER appeals & complaint have been dismissed indicating that Home Office manipulate & add fabricated documents in my appeals, Court Orders were removed from my files as per the Ombudsman, 2 files in my names & only 1 used in my appeals which does not have my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 & Main/ONLY File under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 withheld from appeals 2006 so case dismissed for clouded immigration history as no match to my previous appeal is file passed under INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970, only FIRST Judicial Review which was refused was passed to the Ombudsman BUT second Judicial Review granted on the very day of removal was not seen the by the Ombudsman as stated in ALL 3 letters “On Nov. 1, Ms Small was removed to Jamaica. Her appeals against the removal decision was dismissed”.
My appeal against the removal decision was NOT dismissed before removal Nov. 1. My second Judicial Review was granted May & STOP ORDER on removal for Ann Marie Small to attend Bail Hearing June 8 received at Yarls’ Wood Detention Centre on the VERY DAY of Home Office schedule removal & “indefinite bail” June 8.
Article 13 – Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity (Midlands Enforcement Unit Officer Ms Vicky Dunbarton, her boss & 3 times Arresting Officer Neil Cross)
Article 14 – Prohibition of discrimination which even the Ombudsman has disregard stating that “Comments by Immigration Officer is not in my files” but neither were Court Orders of May/June 8 therefore one on one inter-racial interviews by Home Office should be compulsory recorded as MEU Officer had Tape Recorder & cassetts at interview & opt to use her writing pad only.
I am entitled to a public & fair trial within a reasonable time, compensation for unlawful arrest, re-arrest/detention for charges of illegal entry & overstaying & where the Independent Tribunal rejects Home Office’s FIRST removal Notice of Nov. 6 for Overstaying & Illegal Entry TWICE (MAY & JUNE), told Home Office that he could not see where I had broken ANY immigration laws & ordered Home Office not to removed, re-arrest/detained me INDEFINITELY but 4 months later, Home Office breached Court’s orders & brutally removal Nov. 1 for the same charges, 23 days before my exams.
One on One inter-racial interview by Home Office should not be UNLESS recorded as no one believes me when I complain of discrimination/racial questions.
As per the Ombudsman’s letter of May 23, “Comments by Immigration Officer is not in my files”, therefore, one on one inter-racial interview by Home Office should not be unless recorded. There is NO evidence in my files to support my allegations BUT neither were there Court Orders of May/ June in my files as per the Ombudsman’s letters of 2007.
My appeals, reconsiderations & complaints of 8 have ALL been dismissed for lack of evidence/missing/removed Court Orders yet as at Sept. 8, AIT Helpdesk Grace Sansome email state that “BOTH files are in STORAGE” at the AIT.
6, AIT, Only 1 out of 2 FILES was used in my appeal which makes my immigration history clouded & case dismissed as NO MATCH to my previous appeal was found as per Appeal INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970.
7, The Ombudsman states that NO evidence to support my allegations are in my files. It appears that IND has made a mistake when they stated that Ms Small is an illegal entrant. In any case, Ms Small has appealed that decision & no reference was made to her being illegal entrant (as per Appeal INCORRECT DOB JULY 26, 1970 where my immigration history is clouded as NO MATCH to my previous appeal was found). Only1 file was used in my appeals.
8, I appealed to the Royal Courts of Justice to remove second file from my account S882529– My reconsideration was dismissed citing “application out of time”. My application was received & acknowledged in time then placed on hold awaiting MISSING First Appeal then dismissed.
As per AIT Helpdesk Grace Sansome email Sept. 8, “both files are storage at AIT” YET my case/complaint have been dismissed for lack of evidence to support my allegations. I was removed without my possessions/STOP ORDER on removal for ANN MARIE SMALL but AIT letter of April 28 confirms my Bail Hearing of June 8
As per AIT, there is no appeal before the tribunal now so I have applied for Returning Residence visa Jan. 20which doesn’t carry a fee & pending.
I was removed without my possessions at Flat 47 Calder Tower, 290 Birchfield Road, Handsworth, Birmingham B20 3JX & an unknown company paid £300 & removed them to clear flat as per Birmingham Housing & unable to provide STOP ORDER or any other evidence.
I paid my solicitor for her services, 2 Judicial Review, I lost school fees x3, exams, CIMA Registration x 2, possessions in the UK, my house in Jamaica sized due to documents in the UK, car missing, uncompleted Management Accountant Level 2 associate degree & where my husband quickly divorced me & marry our British neighbor in Birmingham due to Home Office ignoring evidence of travel, pretending that I am not Ann Marie Small & that I enter the UK illegally then breached the Independent Tribunal Orders & brutally removed me 23 days before CIMA old syllabus exams which expires Jan & not taught in Jamaica.
In view of NEW EVIDENCE from AIT in 2009 acquired AFTER appeals, reconsideration & complaints which indicates that Home Office manipulate & add fabricated documents in my appeals/complaints, I hereby request public trial/re-opening of my complaint.
A Judicial Review is the procedure by which you can seek to challenge the decision, action or failure to act of a public body such as a government department or a local authority or other body exercising a public law function. A Prohibition/Quashing Order (i.e. an order preventing the public body from doing something)
STOP ORDER on removal for Ann Marie Small MAY & INDEFINITE BAIL JUNE.
Home Office Birmingham breached second Judicial Review, Court orders, pass new file with INCORRECT DOB July 26, 1970 to the AIT, withheld MAIN IND FILE which they used at Bail Hearing June 8, pass first Judicial Review to the Ombudsman which was refused but withheld second Judicial Review granted on the VERY DAY of removal & Court Orders of June 8 so that the AIT & Ombudsman wouldn’t see that charge of Overstaying & Illegal Entry as per FIRST removal Notice was ALREADY served & dismissed/rejected TWICE by the Independent Tribunal, independent of Home Office, under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970.
Under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970, Home Office removed me for illegal entry as per the British High Commission 3 months after removal but when I provide letter from Air Jamaica confirming travel, Home Office pass new file as per Appeal INCORRECT DOB 26:7:70 where my immigration history is clouded & NO MATCH to Bail Hearing June 8 or the 20 documents signed at Home Office Birmingham under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 as per Court Orders were found in Home Office Birmingham’s second file which meant that all my documents were not contained in Home Office Birmingham’s file (Main IND file used from arrest, Bail Hearing June 8 to breached removal & last used Year 2005 as per Appeal 2005 confirmed Bail Hearing June 8 on AIT letter of April 28).
What happen to ALL 20 documents signed at Home Office Birmingham under my CORRECT DOB MAY 26, 1970 as per Court Orders, second Judicial Review/STOP ORDER on removal for Ann Marie Small/Court Orders of June 8/Birth Paper/Marriage license/Certificates/Diploma/letter from Darlington Travel Agency dated Nov. 3?
I anxiously await your earliest response.
Yours truly,
ANN MARIE SMALLING-SMALL
DOB MAY 26, 1970
HO REF: S 882529
APPEAL IM/07162
CO/7981/08
ECHR application pending.
Address: 41 Content Drive, Greendale, Spanish Town, St. Catherine, JAMAICA
0 comments