We can see that IIB management is very concerned about this site which turns out to be very useful. As my colleague says you are not Jesus Christ to tell which sould is misguided or not. And nobody asked you to save them. As my other colleague says, instead or pushing associates to publish positive reports to balance the negative ones, organise a survey by a third party and commit to publishing it on the homepage, that would be a neutral adn objective figure.
You get nervous, probably because most IIB unfair practises that have been told here are true.
Although IIB is theoretically a non for profit organisation, IIB is a very efficient business at making money.
On the one hand:
- An efficient recruitment process using flattery, promises
- A rather well organised one week training period called RBS.
On the other hand mostly nothing:
10 free appointments almost all irrelevant (not meeting any solid criteria such meeting actual decision makers leading companies with a potential business),
A BSP script that does not work at least outside England. People have always interrupted me before the end of the open, asking me to tell them why I was here.
A limited domestic network with interesting people but more limited and less efficient than some others you could join for cheaper,
An irrelevant international network who has never needed me, and from which I have not found any answer to the 2 or 3 questions I asked
Dozens useless mails who spam the mail box each day
Moreover as it has beel already, IIB has a very clever internal process, not to let anyone use the internal tools for criticism or even asking a difficult question. And last year when an associate tried to organise a survey on the Intranet he was expelled.
Candidates, if nevertheless you decide to join IIB, no problem, the only real criteria is your ability to pay entry fees and good luck.
Ak
RA
Israel
0 comments